I made a master hologram of a sand-dollar yesterday morning which came out nice and bright and clean and Susan suggested a two-channel, front and back of the same subject. Being in the groove I set about doing just that.
I exposed the left half of the plate, put the plate in my drying box while flipping the subject, got the plate back out and switched the mask so that the left half of the plate was covered and the right clear. Exposed, developed and found that the right channel was bright and clear and the left look dim and ugly. Examining the final bleached hologram lead me to believe that the plate had moved during the first exposure, mostly because I couldn't find any other cause.
So I set about trying again. Because I already had the second channel subject set up, I exposed this plate "backwards" right to left (for anyone who missed it, the first plate was exposed left to right).
After processing the left channel was again dim and ugly with the right being bright and clear. What the?
Looking at this second plate it almost looks like the left channel was under-exposed. Which is odd because all my exposures are automated
and both channels were exposed the same amount of time.
can't find any sources of stray light and don't believe object movement is at fault since I would expect the second channel in the first hologram to be dim rather than the first (since I had just flipped the subject).
Sunday...
Well, this has gone behond the realm of concidence an on to alien influenced madness.
Just kidding about that last part.

I shot another two-channel last night with the same results. In this case I didn't bleach the hologram before finding out how it went and found that again, the left channel was dim and ugly. It also appeared to have received more light than the right channel.
I've checked the light ratios between the channels and both are spot on at 3:1 and the exposure times were correct for each channel.
The only theory I have at the moment is perhaps murphy was visiting me and somehow the shutter didn't close fast enough on the left channel (three times in a row, right) which caused it to be over-exposed. I've done a series of tests on the shutter and software controlling it and it's worked properly in each test, so this isn't much of a theory.
I'm going to be doing another this morning with a different subject and will also post the results later.
later...
The try this morning came out well except for the fact that the subject moved on the first exposure. I can tell that it rolled slightly. That's a bit odd since it had been sitting on the table overnight.
I'll have to try again tomorrow.