<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Hexcel
February 4 2004 at 4:12 PM
bill mcgarvin  (no login)

Wait!
Micheal and others about to build tables, don't resort to the pvc or cans just yet. I've got a source here in St. Louis that has some hexcel so sell by the pound!
Its surplus from Boeing Aircraft that is available in a few different sizes.
I built my 4'x8'x8" table using three big chunks with one milimeter cells. I epoxied the chunks together with aircraft epoxy from Wicks Aircraft in Illinois.
I then ran out of epoxy before I got to doing the top and bottom skins with series 400 stainless. That damn epoxy was thirty-five bucks a pint and I could'nt afford any more nor did I have the patience to save the money required so I just grabbed some Liquid Nails to finish the job! Ok, well that was'nt by best idea because its taken a number of months for all of the L.N. to set up hard.
Its stable enough to make bright silver holograms, ten inch by ten inch, transmission, and is light enough for two guys to carry it.
Saturday I'll have time to post pictures and give more acurate description of whats available and for how much!



 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
tell us more!February 4 2004, 4:37 PM 

Wow.

I've already got the material to do a 4x'1 breadboard test with PVC so I'll go ahead and finish that but I'm seriously interested in this.

What sort of support are you using for your table top?

Looking forward to any details you can give!



---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re: HexcelFebruary 4 2004, 5:16 PM 

Sign me up for some!
 
 Respond to this message   
Tony
(no login)
more details please!February 4 2004, 5:47 PM 

What's the weight of the table, and what do you use for cushioning - inner tubes, bubble wrap, etc??
 
 Respond to this message   
Greg Garriss
(no login)
HexcelFebruary 5 2004, 5:30 PM 

Metal Hexcel is nice stuff for tables though a bit awkward to work with. ( easy to cut along cells boundaries, a pain to face cut. ) You can get it in a variety of formats from Hexcel ( www.hexcel.com )if you've got deep pockets. You can also order it skinned with various materials. For example, commercial aircraft floors are 1/2" phenolic hexcel with a fiberglass skin on both sides.

If you have access to industrial surplus ( Boeing uses a lot of it for "filler" in composite structures here in Seattle and in St.Louis ), you can often find the phenolic and aluminum versions in several cell sizes and thicknesses. I've seen 4" thick aluminum material with 1/8" aluminum skins on both sides in 4'x8' sheets.

Most commercial optical tables are steel honeycomb construction with 1/4" steel skins. Not sure if the core is a Hexcel product but mine is pretty light and very rigid.
 
 Respond to this message   

(Login bill_mcgarvin)
photosFebruary 6 2004, 12:06 PM 

Alright guys I was able to get some photos but they,re getting clipped off at the bottom.

Are the files too large and if so how do I need to shrink them?



 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Hexcel (hopefully)February 10 2004, 10:38 PM 

Hopefully this works this time.
I've just started a website where I can upload some photos (finally).
If this doesn't hot link just click.
http://indimensionn.com/page4.html



and this shows my
http://indimensionn.com/page3.html



 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
one more timeFebruary 15 2004, 4:59 PM 

Ok guys and girls, thanks for your patience but I think I have those hexel pics posted now;

http://www.indimensionn.com/page4.html

and my table;

http://www.indimensionn.com/page3.html



 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re:one more timeFebruary 15 2004, 7:45 PM 

Gary, first of all thanks for sharing your ingenious set up. It looks great and is shows you have put a lot of time and thought into fabricating it.

By the way, your photos must be huge because it takes a very long time to load them when viewing your page. Of course my 56k modem doens't help either. It took about 30 minutes for the entire page to load. But after the first image loaded it captivated my attention.

Your draft exclusion is done very professionally and the gantry looks very stable. Where did you get the material for the gantry? Is it the stuff found in large walk-in refrigerators/freezers.

Is there a reason you did not paint the top skin of the table black? I am not real familliar with trying to paint stainless steel. Is it possible?

I like your combination of sand and inner tube tires for vibration isolation.

I can't wait to see your photos of some holograms you have made.

Peace!
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re:correctionFebruary 15 2004, 7:57 PM 

Bill, I have no idea where I got Gary from. Sorry!

John
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re: Re:one more timeFebruary 15 2004, 11:31 PM 

"Is there a reason you did not paint the top skin of the table black? I am not real familliar with trying to paint stainless steel. Is it possible?"

I paint stainless all of the time. It paints just like steel.
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
paintFebruary 16 2004, 9:16 AM 

Well I was afraid that if I painted the stainless that it would get all scratched up from scooting magnets and bumping steel pipes into it all the time.

Do ya have some kind hotrod primer that would resist that kind of scratching?
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re: paintFebruary 16 2004, 9:22 AM 

I used Krylon Ultra-flat black. I put a very thin coat down. I find it pickups stains but it is very scratch resistant. Theraml grease is the worst ofender. Since the paint is so cheap I figure I can re-spray the table when needed.
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
paintFebruary 16 2004, 9:49 AM 

Ah, yes I remember the old paint-scratch-repaint technique from a few years ago when I dicided to paint my 79'chevy impala station wagon flat black to defeat the cops' laser radar. It worked fine and it cost about 20 bucks to paint the whole thing, windows and all.
I'll give it a shot on a test portion of my table.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re:one more timeFebruary 15 2004, 7:55 PM 

What is the water flow set up you have in your last pict?
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re: Re:one more timeFebruary 15 2004, 9:47 PM 

No sweat about the name John.
The Material for the gantry is just schedule 40 steel 2" pipe with Keeklamp connectors ( also Cheeseborough clamps from the staging industry), which can be expensive for the large sizes and I've probably gone overboard by using such a large system its just that it felt so good to be totally hardcore!
The draft exclusion is the same as that described by Saxby in the 2nd edition and yeah its the walkin freezer stuff. My basement is a really dusty enviroment and it has now a coating of dust that does'nt seem to want to seal like it used to and for that reason I might reconsider this draft exclusion technique for one that lowers a box over the table.
Next time that is. Right now I only have an inch or so clearance above my gantry system.
As far as the water in the last pic; that's where I wash the film. Its just a plastic tray I've got at an angle that I clip film to while I run water over it.
The bottom of the tray rests in the sink where the water drains ( I'll get better photos of that next week). I dont have filtered water but I always rinse in deionized before and after such a wash.
Bill

 
 Respond to this message   
BILL
(no login)
Hexcel updateFebruary 27 2004, 10:47 AM 

Well the responce for the Hexcel was good enough to justify buying the whole stack so as of this morning I own all fifteen pieces of the "type 1" stack (as refered to on my website <indimensionn dot com>). I'll gladly sell them cheap to holographers.
For each sheet I will charge $30.00 plus shipping.
Shipping is probably going to cost you a lot more because of the bulky size. That'll have to be quoted on a case-by-case basis but you could figure around $150 to $300 depending on your proximity to St. Louis.
...........However!............
On Tuesday March 9th the day job has me driving a box truck from St. Louis to San Diego and I'll deliver to anyone along the way for free.
the route I'll take is as follows:
I-44 through Joplin,
69 to Dallas,
I-20 to I-10,
I-10 to I-8
I-8 to San Diego

Those of you who have already contacted me please do so again so that I may get your address for a shipping quote.
Bill McGarvin
bmcgarvin@imagetechnologies dot com





 
 Respond to this message   
Dinesh
(no login)
San Diego arrivalMarch 4 2004, 4:04 PM 

If you're coming to San Diego drop by and see the lab (and us). Phone and email on site at bottom of page.
 
 Respond to this message   
bill mcgarvin
(no login)
Thanks!March 5 2004, 3:35 PM 

Thanks Dinesh, I'll do that!

BILL









 
 Respond to this message   


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
Using hexcel?March 10 2004, 12:05 PM 

Ok, Bill dropped off the Hexcel last night. I've got three 3.5' x 6.7' x 1.4" sheets to work with and Andres bought two. After talking holography (and drinking beer) for a while with Bill he left for his hotel and Andres and I seriously lamented the fact that we had to work the next day and that the local hardware stores weren't open at 12am.

For those more familiar with the material, what would you recommend for skin material and size, adhesive and final panel thickness? I've sent an email off to Hexcel with the specs from the box the sheets came in (ahh, five sheets of nearly pristine hexcel) and I hope to have some specific information on what material the sheets are made of. It appears to be aluminum and Bill was guessing that it's aircraft grade since it came from Boeing.

I'm thinking of cutting my sheets into 3.5' x 5' sheets so that I can end up with four layers, using 16ga steel for the skins and either PC7 or JB-weld epoxy.

I'd end up with something like... (side view)

---------------------
ooooooooooooooooooooo
---------------------
ooooooooooooooooooooo
---------------------
ooooooooooooooooooooo
---------------------
ooooooooooooooooooooo
---------------------

and a final panel that is close to 6" thick.

It's slightly possible that I could use the full-length panels and end up with three layers rather than four but that would take a serious re-design of the layout of my office.




---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
Hexcel dataMarch 10 2004, 1:22 PM 

Well, if their responsiveness is any indication Hexcel is a good company to work with.

The material that Bill acquired is CR III 5052 & 5056 Corrosion Resistant Specification Grade Aluminum 1/8 4.5lb core. The PDF is available in the first row on the following page

http://www.hexcelcomposites.com/Markets/Downloads/default.asp?root=hon




---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   
Colin Kaminski
(no login)
Re: Hexcel dataMarch 10 2004, 4:31 PM 

So your shear modulus is 70,000 on the long axis and 31,000 on the short axis. Which makes it's lower shear modulus than blue foam. Run the math for the table stiffness.
 
 Respond to this message   


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
errors?March 11 2004, 4:50 AM 

Something doesn't quite add up (I hope). I'm using the basic LEOT calculations and values and substituting my numbers (shear of 70K, width 3.5', length 5', pane thickness 0.11667) and end up with a deflection of 2186.484 wavelengths.

If I simply expand the pane thickness to my final estimated 6" I end up with a deflection of 495 wavelengths.




---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   
Colin Kaminski
(no login)
Re: errors?March 11 2004, 9:27 AM 

That is what got as well (well I got a little different because I did not look up the exact thickness of 16 ga steel). We both neglected the steel in between the sheets but they don't contribute as much as the skin. We could derive the equation for the added steel but it would take me a whole evening as my math skills aren't the best. Figure it is only the caps and the next layers in of steel that helps. When you see the large honey comb tables they are steel and have very thick honey comb papers. If you look at the pdf you reference you will see even in Al the parameters are very different based on cell geometry.

The inner skins are 2.8" apart and that alone will give you some stiffness. But not as much as doubling the outer-skins so that give you a limit on how much the can contribute.
 
 Respond to this message   


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
Mars lander crashes!!!March 11 2004, 2:36 PM 

I believe that we both plugged in the numbers given by Hexcel without converting them to the proper units used by the LEOT formula.

I found the thickness for 16ga steel which is 0.0625" or 0.005' for LEOT.

The shear modulus given by Hexcel is 70,000 lb/sq in and converted to lb/sq ft is 1.008*10^7

With these changes I get a deflection of 45.01 wavelengths at 633nm with a 100lb load on a 10 x 5' table.

If I plug in the numbers for a 3.5 x 5' table like I'm considering, I end up with a theoretical deflection of 3.03 wavelengths.



---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   
Colin Kaminski
(no login)
Re: Mars lander crashes!!!March 11 2004, 7:21 PM 

Whew!

That makes more sense. Inches, feet it's all the same right?

That should be a very nice table at about 3 times the stiffness of mine and much lighter.

    
This message has been edited by colinholo on Mar 11, 2004 7:22 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
John Klayer
(no login)
Re: Re: Mars lander crashes!!!March 11 2004, 8:37 PM 

Colin,
Is your calculation for the aluminum cans still 200,000 or should it be 2.88*10^7 ?
 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
Re: Re: Re: Mars lander crashes!!!March 12 2004, 7:04 AM 

No, Michael and I just mis-read the hexel data sheet. However, I have been thinking about your data. What is the width of your metal compared to the width of a single can?
 
 Respond to this message   
John Klayer
(no login)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mars lander crashes!!!March 13 2004, 9:51 AM 

The steel is 3" wide. A can is 2.6" wide but taper to 2.12" at the top and 2" at the bottom.
I'm working on the 2'x2' breadboard today.
 
 Respond to this message   


(Login MichaelHarrison2)
Re: Using hexcel?March 12 2004, 7:33 AM 

Nobody here has built their own hexcel tables or worked with hexcel in another field before?

Am I blazing a new trail?



---------------------------
If someone says it can't be done but they haven't tried it, don't believe them.
http://www.dragonseye.com/Holography
 
 Respond to this message   
Andres Ghisays
(no login)
Re: HexcelMarch 12 2004, 11:17 AM 

I have been very interested lately in how to build a better optical table and this thread and others have been very helpful.
I found this article that might be of interest to some of you, it helped me understand a little better what to expect when using honeycomb composite materials like hexcel

http://optics.org/articles/ole/8/11/3/1

BTW, Bill, it was nice to meet you and thank you very much for talking the trouble of delivering the hexcel right to my garage! Hopefully I can soon share some of my holograms using the new table.

Andres.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Hexcel
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Home

Cat Lovers Look Here! ;-)

Porcelain Cat Group's first anual meeting!

Search Tips

Holographers Who Visit Here
To be added to this list please post here:
Add My Link!


Where are you from? Post Here!

Colin Kaminski - Michael Harrison - Kris Meerlo - Vidar Hegdal - Ronnie Anderassen  - Dinesh & JP - JohnFP - wler - Jeff Blyth - Kaveh - Tom B. - Tony - Martin Mueller - Guillermito - Danny Bruza - floh - Sergey Vorobyov - Gary Herbst - Paulos - Jean Dufrasne - Frank DeFreitas - Jonathan Ross - Lucas Fousekis -